Trần Hoàng Blog

  • Bài viết mới

  • Thư viện

  • Chuyên mục

  • Tháng Sáu 2011
    C H B T N S B
  • Bài viết mới

Housing in the US 2011

Posted by hoangtran204 trên 28/06/2011

Bank-owned Houses: Curb Appeal Goes Out the Window

By STEVE YODER, The Fiscal Times

June 24, 2011

There’s a new kind of neighbor in town, and they won’t be stopping by for a barbeque anytime soon.

In many communities nationwide, that new neighbor is a bank or other mortgage lender. Since the onset of the housing crisis five years ago, the nation’s lenders have been steadily amassing vast residential real estate empires, by taking back foreclosed homes that don’t sell at auction. The number of homes owned by financial institutions has doubled since 2007 to 872,000, according to real estate data firm RealtyTrac. With 3 million more foreclosures expected in 2011, lenders could end up repossessing several million more in coming years.

So what kind of neighbors do mortgage lenders make? That may depend on where you live: Some legislators and community activists say banks do a better job of maintaining properties in wealthier neighborhoods than they do in middle-income and marginal ones. And four cities — Baltimore, Cleveland, Los Angeles and Memphis — are taking lenders to court in an effort to force them to take better care of their properties. In separate lawsuits, the cities are seeking hundreds of millions in damages from lenders, to cover increased city maintenance costs and reduced property tax revenues.

In the working-class Memphis neighborhood of Burlington, Lynda Whalen is leading a battle against foreclosure blight. After the bank foreclosed on one house and the owners left, it wasn’t long before the front windows had been smashed, and the yard was strewn with debris. Whalen, president of the neighborhood association, and her neighbors boarded up the house; they paid a contractor to clean up the yard. Because the mortgage was federally guaranteed, in mid-May the bank turned the house over to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Maintenance has since improved, according to Whalen. (The bank, which a HUD field service contractor identified as Wells Fargo, did not return a call for comment in time for publication.)

In California cities like Long Beach and Palm Springs where investor Jim Shute buys and sells distressed properties in the $100,000 to $200,000 range, banks’ performance is similar. Big banks tend to do the minimum necessary to avoid being cited for code violations, he says. They usually keep the grass cut and board up broken windows, but they don’t do repairs, plant flowers or make other investments that would improve the sales price. That’s good news for Shute. “It actually does hurt what they can get for it,” he says.

The situation is different in the more affluent enclaves where Las Vegas realtor Ken Lowman works. In high-end Las Vegas markets, such as Southern Highlands, it’s rare to find bank-owned properties that aren’t well taken care of, he says. Banks pay close attention to the condition of these properties because they’ll likely get back the money they put into maintenance and repair — on a $4 million sale, green lawns, clean windows and well-kept pools, have a big impact on the sales price.

In some ways, it makes economic sense for banks to manage the properties they own (often called REO properties, for “real-estate owned”) differently in wealthy versus modest neighborhoods. Because retail buyers tend to look for move-in ready properties, while investors tend to seek fixer-uppers, banks generally invest in maintenance and repairs in the former but not the latter. In Memphis, properties in wealthier neighborhoods are aggressively marketed to retail buyers, says Webb Brewer, one of the lawyers representing the city in its lawsuit. Webb had a researcher look at REO buyers in white, wealthier neighborhoods — 70 percent of them were retail and 30 percent were investors; in lower income, minority neighborhoods, the figures were reversed.

Other data supports the claims that neighborhood demographics influence how well bank-owned homes are maintained. An April report from the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), a national nonprofit that addresses housing discrimination, concluded that maintenance practices were “consistently better” in white  neighborhoods  than in those that were predominantly African-American.  The report analyzed 624 bank-owned properties (also known as “REOs,” for “real estate owned”) in four states.

Mortgage lenders dispute those claims. “All of the homes that we have on our books are treated exactly the same way,” says Philippa Brown, spokesperson for American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. “They’ve all got to be up to code. Do I think there’s been such a volume of homes that some have fallen through the cracks? Definitely. But in every neighborhood … if they’re brought to our attention we fix them fast because we want to get them sold.”

REOs in marginal and modestly priced communities may end up neglected because lenders often  contract with outside “property preservation” firms, who in turn hire local contractors. Because of the property preservation business is booming as the number of foreclosures grows, many new and inexperienced players are entering the business. Critics say that means the quality of the contractors and subcontractors varies widely. “The problems arose in this industry as the market changed,” says Michael Anz, CEO of property preservation company MGA Services, which has operated since 1999. “There have been so many new players in the industry who don’t understand the business.”

In other cases, banks hire local real-estate brokers to get properties ready to sell. But brokers have to pay for repairs and maintenance out of their own pockets, then get reimbursed, according to Mike Krein, president of the National REO Brokers Association. Some brokers decide to skip repairs, especially for lower-end houses. Krein says there’s often pressure on banks from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to spread out contracts to numerous brokers rather than picking the few that specialize in REOs.

But with a glut of foreclosures forcing prices down nationwide, banks simply may not be able to sink money into houses that are losing value, according to Albert J. Sumell, an economist at Youngstown State University who has studied the valuation of foreclosures. He says banks just can’t afford to put thousands of dollars into a property if don’t they expect to get it back.

Some local legislators and community groups are taking steps to change that economic equation.
In Ohio, legislation passed in April 2010 allows some counties to start nonprofit “land banks” that are funded through county-assessed penalties and interest collected on overdue property taxes. Land banks can acquire lenders’ unwanted REOs through donation or purchase; in exchange, the land bank clears the title of liens (fines, back taxes). The county then decides how best to use the property — either rehabilitating and selling it or demolishing it.

And in California, a state foreclosure reform law passed in 2008 allows cities and counties to require banks to register foreclosed properties and levies fines if properties aren’t maintained. An ordinance in Long Beach, for example, allows the city to fine a bank up to $1,000 a day if it doesn’t do basic maintenance like cutting grass and fixing broken windows. Illinois now is considering similar legislation.

In Long Beach, banks have registered 418 properties, and the city hasn’t had to issue a single fine in the two months since the law was enacted. That’s a success, even if the city doesn’t make a dime in fines, according to Rex Richardson, chief of staff to city councilman Steve Neal, who introduced the ordinance. “Good code enforcement should never be a revenue generator,” he says.

Related Links:
Foreclosures: Luxury Homes on the Auction Block (The Fiscal Times)
Investors are Flipping over Low Home Prices (The Fiscal Times)
Housing Double Dip: Why Prices Will Keep Dropping (The Fiscal Times)


Another Blow to Housing: Home Prices at 2002 Levels

By JENNIFER DEPAUL, The Fiscal Times
May 31, 2011

In the latest sign of a weak economy, home prices in March fell to their lowest point since the housing collapse began. Prices are now back to mid-2002 levels as the housing market remains bogged down by an oversupply of inventory and an undersupply of buyers and may not have hit bottom.

Home prices fell 4.2 percent in the first quarter of 2011, the eighth consecutive quarterly drop, according to the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller National Home Price Index, putting the index 5.1 percent below the first quarter of 2010. “This month’s report is marked by the confirmation of a double-dip in home prices across much of the nation,” David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P indices said in a statement. “Home prices continue on their downward spiral with no relief in sight.”

Consumer confidence also declined, according to a separate report.

Home prices are now 33 percent below their 2006 peak and have fallen by more than the 31 percent decline that took place during the Great Depression. “The current housing crash will further eclipse the one seen during the Great Depression, if not in duration, certainly in size,” said Paul Dales, economist with Capital Economics. He warned that when home prices fell during the Great Depression, it took   19 years for the market to regain its value.

Even more troubling, the bottom has yet to be reached Dales said. Some experts say that home prices will fall another five to 10 percent this year and may bottom out in 2012 at the earliest. Earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors said the pending home sales index, which tracks contracts signed in April, fell by 11.6 percent from March.

“People don’t want to buy homes if house prices are going to fall further,” said Karen Dynan, economist with Brookings Institution. “There can be a negative self reinforcing cycle—house prices are falling because demand is soft, people expect house prices to fall further so they become more reluctant to buy homes and house prices fall further.” Dynan said she can’t predict when the housing market will hit bottom.

Prices plunged in 19 metro areas tracked by the S&P/Case Shiller Index of 20 metro areas compared with last year. Minneapolis posted a 10 percent decline from a year earlier. Washington, D.C. was the only city to show an annual gain.

Twelve cities hit their lowest levels in nearly four years:  Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Las Vegas, Miami, Minneapolis, New York, Phoenix, Portland, Ore., and Tampa. The 20-city composite posted an annual rate of decline of 3.6 percent, while prices fell 2.9 percent in the 10-city composite.

A record number of foreclosure sales are forcing home prices down. Sales of bank-owned homes and those in some stage of foreclosure accounted for 28 percent of all residential sales in the first quarter of 2011, according to RealtyTrac, the largest online market for foreclosed properties. High unemployment also has cut into home sales.

But not all housing experts are pessimistic. “The housing market is at a turning point as conditions are beginning to look up,” said Mike Zoller, economist with Moody’s Analytics. “Though job creation–one of housing demand’s key drivers–had been proceeding at glacial pace, the rate of growth is picking up. With hours worked rising and corporate profitability surging, hiring will step up further. This will boost confidence and incomes, fostering growth in the housing market.”

Meanwhile, in a separate report Tuesday, the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence fell steeply in May to a six month low and now stands at 60.8 (on a scale of 100), down from 66 in April.

“Consumers are considerably more apprehensive about future business and labor market conditions as well as their income prospects. Inflation concerns, which had eased last month, have picked up once again,” said Lynn Franco, director of the Conference Board Consumer Research Center in a statement.

The reports come days before the Labor Dept.’s May employment report on Friday. Experts predict the number of new jobs will well below April’s surprisingly strong 244,000 increase. The consensus is for May’s numbers to be around 175,000 new jobs created.

Click Here For Housing Market Coverage

Related Links:
Home Prices Still Falling (Wall Street Journal)
S&P/Case Shiller Signals Double Dip in Housing Economic Report (MarketWatch)
Five Questions on Tuesday’s S&P/Case Shiller (Wall Street Journal)

Bạn cứ phịa ra một email hoặc tên nào đó để viết ý kiến. Comment của tất cả các bạn đọc sẽ được hiện ra.

Mời bạn điền thông tin vào ô dưới đây hoặc kích vào một biểu tượng để đăng nhập: Logo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Google photo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Google Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Twitter picture

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Twitter Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Facebook photo

Bạn đang bình luận bằng tài khoản Facebook Đăng xuất /  Thay đổi )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: